Talk to Pakistan in Pakistan’s language
Hypocrisy of man is proved when he commits something but when it comes to their chance he decides to at stay back foot and act like he never utter anything earlier. This is what we encounter in the case of Uri attack on 18sept by some infiltrators on an Indian army camp in which various mothers and sisters lost their sons and brothers but our Prime minister before sitting on chair of supreme used to comment that he will act strictly with the terrorism. This is not the first time when our souls are encroached by the terrorism; an eye for an eye will leave this world blind but this theory is not applicable for the terrorist who kill people mercilessly whether for the sake of money or a religion.
Not so foregone, Mumbaikers will never forget those FORTY-EIGHT hours of 26/11 attack in which Mumbai was on calcine by some unidentified gunmen, and then they don’t even know that their bread winners or kindred will make their presence in the home again. “we have to punish “ by our former security adviser M.K Narayan when our former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh called an emergency meeting, so that they can make some important decision .the evidence that the Lashker-e-Taiba was involved in this attack, Nation Security adviser pointed it out, was irrefutable. On the other side where our Air Force was ready for Air Strike but they could not do so because our intelligence could not provide adequate digital information of the Lashkar camps, cited by Fali Homi Major (Air Force Chief) but our General Deepak Kapoor flatly said we could not do surgical strike .
It’s quite easy to comment or find loop holes in others business because it’s human tendency- “they did nothing” said candidly by our current Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a campaign speech centered on 26/11 attack “talk to Pakistan in Pakistan’s language. But now our prime minister has this opportunity to act on what he said in his speech when our nation’s saviors were killed in their camp. Ajit Doval, National Security advisor called top military and intelligence meeting to prepare plan how we can retaliate this jihadist but what was the outcome of the summit was few option on which we can think.
The first one was an old fashion in which our Indian Army can act, using eye for a tooth rules where both the armies armed well. Ideally, Pakistan army is helping in retaliation of terrorist which has been proved various times by the evidences and arms used in attack of Uri. Talk about raids and on the other side Pakistan let the infiltration, which Indian will get hurt more than Pakistan.
The second one is attractive to the heated Indian or a politician, is air strike on jihadist target across the LoC but stop short of outright conflict. India’s ability to conduct has been significantly enhanced but not proved to be profitable outcome. In 1998 US fired missiles seeking to avenge bombing which killed 224people but result of that attack of 76 missiles they killed only 6 jihadist, in all a missile’s cost was 1.5 million$. But what if Pakistan hits back to India, targeting to industries’ and infrastructure which results more loss to the Indian side
To be continuing…
Please leave your comment